Little has changed in county governments over the years
Dec. 19, 2004
By MARY CLARKIN
The Hutchinson News
Latin
origins for "consolidate" - combining "together" and "to make
solid" - offer no hint the word can be inflammatory.
John Divine used the word when he ran for Saline
County commissioner this fall. He lost.
Rep. Marti Crow, D-Leavenworth, promotes consolidation
of the district court system in Kansas. She won enough votes
to keep her job, but her ideas have failed to muster needed support.
In 2002, Kansas' nearly 4,000 local governments
put it on the U.S. Census' Top 10 list of states with the most
government units. Consolidations and mergers are so rare that
they generate headlines throughout the state when they do occur.
Such was the case in April 2003 when voters in Bazine USD 304
and Ransom USD 302, with a combined student population of 215,
voted to merge.
Not even the Kansas
Taxpayers Network, a watchdog group, is beating the drum for
government consolidation. The
record of mergers, said Executive Director Karl Peterjohn, is "mixed
at best."
"Often there's no net savings for taxpayers," he
said. "It's just like reshuffling the deck chairs on the cruise
ship."
A bigger government, Peterjohn cautioned, is not
necessarily more effective. In theory, though, he allowed that
consolidation - if done correctly - can save money.
There have been just 33 mergers of city and county
governments in the United States since 1805.
That led state researchers to conclude in a report
published by the Legislative Division of Post Audit in September
2003 that the potential for additional city-county mergers in
Kansas appeared small.
Kansas' lone entry among the 33 mergers was the
Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kan.,
created in 1997.
Leaders there credit the unified government with
enabling the economic development boon in Wyandotte. There is
no talk of returning to separate city and county governments.
Potentially, Wyandotte could be joined some day
by another city-county government in Kansas. Shawnee County voters
agreed in November to ask the Legislature for a commission that
would outline a consolidation plan.
That circuitous route to achieving desired change
at the local level is part of the problem, according to the Kansas
Advisory Council on Intergovernmental Relations.
The 2005 Kansas
Legislature, which convenes Jan. 10, should "act quickly to authorize a process" so
the citizens of Shawnee County or any county interested in
reorganization
of local government, have the power and a method for action,
the advisory council urged.
The 2002 Legislature created the Kansas Advisory
Council on Intergovernmental Relations to study government structure
and find efficiencies.
But the state audit report published in September
2003 described a languishing council that had never met.
That embarrassing disclosure resulted in change.
"We've certainly stepped it up," said
council member Tim Norton, a Sedgwick County commissioner.
The council includes city, county, school and township
representatives, as well as four state legislators. It has met
six times since late September 2003. It filed its 2004 Annual
Report on Dec. 1, attaching two proposals for the 2005 Kansas
Legislature.
It recommended approval of legislation next year
to ease the ability of cities and counties to consider consolidation
and the ability of counties to change boundary lines to accommodate
multi-county consolidation.
"We believe that the citizens of Kansas counties
deserve the strongest measure of local control and self-determination," stated
the proposal submitted by council chairman Michael Boehm, the
mayor of Lenexa.
"Whether the word 'consolidation' is really the
word you want to use or is it 'unification' or is it 'merger'
- we're talking about all those things," Norton said.
"Nothing's off
the table."
One factor discouraging
collaboration among local governments, the 2003 audit report
stated, was "fear of losing
local control of how services are provided." The fear is not
baseless, officials note.
Ripples in the wake of the Kansas Department of
Social and Rehabilitation Services' shutdown of 56 of its 105
county offices reached into Greeley County in western Kansas.
The closing translated into two lost jobs.
Consolidation also can extract a price in time,
opponents in rural counties say, whether that means longer rides
on the school bus or trips to larger counties if court consolidation
eliminates rural judges.
Kansas has many small towns with populations that
shrank even more when their schools were boarded up.
Nashville, where City Councilman Gary Westerman
grew up, once had three schools. First, St. John Lutheran grade
school closed. Then Nashville High School locked the doors in
1966, two years after Westerman graduated.
"They went round and round and round and round
to try to keep that school," he said.
The town's public grade school folded last, more
than two decades ago.
Today, Nashville has a co-op and an insurance agency.
A grant helped build a community center in the 1990s, and senior
citizens gather there for meals.
The Kingman County town's surviving church, St.
John, has only a couple youths in Sunday school.
"Our town's still here," said Westerman, "but
it just keeps dwindling."
As the Legislative Division of Post Audit team
studied the potential for improving cooperation and reducing
duplication among local governments, it zeroed in on three counties:
Dickinson, Sedgwick and Douglas.
There were significantly more examples of city-county
cooperation in Douglas County than in the other two counties,
researchers found.
In Sedgwick County, for example, Wichita maintained
79 parks, while the county maintained two.
City officials told the researchers they had offered
to take over park maintenance, but the county declined.
In Dickinson County, the researchers calculated
$65,000 could be saved if the county took over road grading for
townships. In fact, most counties already have assumed maintenance
of township roads.
Township officials cited concerns about the quality
and frequency of county service, however, and Dickinson County
officials did not want to force the issue.
Also in Dickinson County, the county has a 911
emergency system, but Herington continues to operate its own
911 system.
Herington residents are taxed for the duplicated
service, and the Dickinson County emergency communications director
acknowledged the two systems have resulted in confusion for first
responders.
In the executive summary of the 2003 audit report,
the authors wrote:
"Opportunities
to consolidate or share resources among local governmental
entities are plentiful. ... The difficulty
lies in getting local government officials to seek out and embrace
those opportunities, and to work together to change the status
quo.
"Concerns about
losing local control, fear that service levels will deteriorate,
lack of political will to make
a change, distrust or competition among government entities,
a desire to buy locally, and fear that costs or benefits won't
be equally shared are all factors that discourage local collaborative
efforts."
As for the local
authorities, the researchers said they saw themselves "as looking out for their constituents' best
interest." The state also drew blame.
The audit revealed, for example that the state
requires county treasurers and county clerks to maintain duplicate
bookkeeping records. Amend the law, the report urged.
Nothing passed in the Legislature this year, however, to streamline
record maintenance, said Joe Lawhon, with the Legislative Division
of Post Audit.
There is little the state can do to encourage reorganization
or intergovernmental cooperation if local officials aren't interested,
the audit report concluded.
"Maybe it shouldn't be surprising that people have
become comfortable with their multitudinous local government," said
James Nowlan, a former Illinois state representative and professor
with the University of Illinois Institute of Government and Public
Affairs.
Illinois topped the 2002 U.S. Census list of states
having the most local governments.
Nowlan described
two groups: People who like the status quo - perhaps because
their jobs could be at stake - and
a larger number, the majority, only "passively interested in
change."
"Probably the small number is going to trump the
passive majority," he said. Catalysts for change can come from
unexpected quarters.
Post-World War II Illinois had about 11,000 school
districts, many of them township-level one-room schools, Nowlan
said.
The Illinois Farm Bureau leadership, Nowlan said,
jumpstarted a school district consolidation that reduced the
count to about a couple thousand.
"I'm assuming it was a combination of desire for
better rural education and for what might have been thought to
be tax savings," said Nowlan, theorizing on the impetus.
"The illustration
shows that such a process can be jumpstarted if an important
organization sees the rationales
for doing so."
12/10/2004; 10:47:46 PM