Little has changed in county governments over the years
Dec. 12, 2004
By Sharon Montague
The Salina Journal
When
Kansas counties were established in the 1860s, their governments
were modeled after the "weak government" system used by the Massachusetts
Bay Colony.
"There were a lot of elected officials, but the
counties were basically creatures of the state, administrative
arms of the state," said Joe Aistrup, associate professor and
head of the political science department at Kansas State University. "There
were a lot of elected officials, but they had no power. They
did what the state told them to do."
That changed in the mid-1970s with the advent of
home rule, which freed counties to develop programs and deliver
services based on their particular needs.
"The needs of society drove the need for counties
to provide services," Aistrup said. "There was pressure from
the public."
Now, with the start of a new century, some are
pressing for more changes in county government, saying professional
management - as opposed to management by elected officials -
is the model of the future.
"
At some point, the complexity of operations forces the need to have
a chief administrative officer," said John Nalbandian, professor
and chairman of the Department of Public Administration at the
University of Kansas.
Others disagree.
"I hear some complaints it's outdated," said Lonie
Addis, who has served as a commissioner in Labette County for
22 years. "But the more I get into it, the better it is. I'm
a firm believer in county government."
But Nalbandian
considers the election of county officials such as sheriffs,
treasurers and clerks, "an artifact
of the past."
Operations would be more efficient and professional,
he said, if county commissioners hired an administrator who appointed
the sheriff, clerk, register of deeds, county attorney and treasurer.
Such a system mirrors the city manager/city commission form of
government. That allows for more professionalism in government,
Aistrup said.
"The department heads are more like civil servants,
hired on the basis of qualifications as opposed to their ability
to win election," he said.
That becomes more important, Aistrup said, as government
becomes more complex.
"People who are elected can get the hang of things,
but there tends to be a ramp-up time," Aistrup said. "It takes
time to learn the trade and craft."
Get rid of our jobs
Carol Marinovich, the mayor/CEO of the Unified
Government of Wyandotte County in Kansas City, said she didn't
know if county government was antiquated in general. But she
said her county had outgrown the old form of government.
Wyandotte County is the state's only completely
consolidated local government.
"Having dual city and county government didn't
make sense for us," Marinovich said. "It was antiquated for my
community. We were a little unique in that we didn't have that
unincorporated area where the city didn't provide services for
it."
Consolidation is difficult, she said, because people
in elected offices essentially have to advocate the elimination
of their positions.
"I think it's very difficult," Marinovich said, "to
get elected officials to campaign to eliminate their elected
positions, quite candidly, assuming consolidation makes sense
for their community."
John Divine did just that. The Salina Democrat
ran for election to the Saline County Commission this fall as
a proponent for change. If elected, Divine said, he would call
for a public vote to commission a study of three approaches to
county government - variations on the current arrangement, a
strong manager form or consolidation with the city.
"The structure of the county has to come into
the 21st century," Divine, who had served eight years as a Salina
city commissioner, said during the campaign.
The 61-year-old Divine lost to Republican incumbent
Craig Stephenson, 47, Gypsum.
Nalbandian said it's often difficult for people
to consider a change in government, especially when it could
mean an elimination of elected offices.
"It has to do with people wanting a sense of identity,
a sense of control, a sense of having some anchors in their lives," Nalbandian
said. "It doesn't matter whether they're making good decisions
or not, because we don't know if they are. But if we don't like
what they're doing, we can un-elect them."
Elect good people
Addis, the long-time Labette County commissioner,
said county government can be tweaked to meet the needs of 21st
century Kansans, but it doesn't need a major overhaul.
In many counties, Addis noted, commissioners have
hired administrators to help them manage day-to-day operations
without actually changing the form of government.
Labette County hasn't seen the need for an administrator, but Addis
said commissioners hired a county coordinator who does research on
various topics and reviews policies and procedures.
"He doesn't have an administrative role, or a supervisory
role, over the other departments," Addis said. "He does legwork
for us. Right now, he's looking into different insurance Addis
said the structure of county government provides for checks and
balances.
"The treasurer and clerk check each other, and
the bills go to commissioners every month so they check those," he
said. "There are all sorts of checks and balances. That's why
county government is such a good system."
Addis said he's worked with different elected officials
during his 22-year tenure, and most have done a good job.
"For the most part, the electorate knows what they're
doing," he said. "They usually elect good people."
And if the public finds a bad apple, Addis noted, there are systems
in place to recall elected officials before the end of their terms.
"There are flaws with every system," he said, "but
this is a system that, for the most part, works."
12/10/2004; 10:47:46 PM